« Did Forest City Ratner get "bilked" by Yonkers defendant (as suggested in 2010 Times coverage)? Trial testimony indicates the opposite | Main | What the Times put in the Metro section instead of covering the Yonkers corruption case involving Forest City Ratner's Ridge Hill project »
February 29, 2012
House Acts Against High Court On Eminent Domain
The Associated Press via NPR.org
The House has passed legislation to undercut a 2005 Supreme Court ruling that gives state and local governments eminent domain authority to seize private property for economic development projects.
Supporters of the bill say the 5-4 high court decision was an instance of overreach, and that the government should not be able to take away a private person's home or business for commercial purposes.
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution says private property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation, and eminent domain has traditionally been used to obtain land for public projects such as highways or airports.
The bill would withhold for two years all federal development aid to states or locales that take private property for economic development. It now goes to the Senate.
NoLandGrab: You know what they say — put 435 monkeys in a room with a typewriter, and eventually they'll craft one halfway-decent piece of legislation.
Related coverage...
Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn, House Passes Bill to Protect Against Post-Kelo Eminent Domain Abuses. Will Senate Even Vote On It?
In post-Kelo 2005 the House overwhelmingly passed the same punitive bill but the Senate didn't act. Rumor had it that it was New York's own Senator Schumer who led the Senate stonewalling on the bill to protect the real estate industry. There was also a full scale effort to block the bill by Mayor Bloomberg (blocking it was one of the items on Bloomberg's 2006 "Five Priorities" card.)
Let's see what happens this time.
Posted by eric at February 29, 2012 9:59 PM