« Notes from a conference on zoning: scrap parking minimums, the argument for competitiveness, and a dissent | Main | From GQ: Jay-Z's path from the streets to high society (and what about fronting?) »
November 20, 2011
In Our Time Press, questionable coverage of the latest lawsuit
Atlantic Yards Report
The notorious Stephen Witt, now writing for Bed-Stuy-based Our Time Press, has produced his coverage of the lawsuit filed earlier this week: Another Atlantic Yards lawsuit: Allegations that training program does not bring union jobs as promised.
There's no mention of the issue of unpaid wages, but a "he said, she said" focus on whether jobs and union cards were promised to 36 trainees in a highly selective program. Witt writes:
But both FCR and BUILD officials said union cards were never promised, and charged James, state Sen. Velmanette Montgomery and longtime foes of Atlantic Yards are behind the lawsuit. They also said their opposition is a major contributing force behind the lack of jobs as promised by the CBA.
...[BUILD's James] Caldwell said his organization has placed close to 400 people from the community with jobs, many on other FCR developments, and that the downturn in the economy has caused the build-out of the Atlantic Yards project to be much slower.
...[Forest City spokesman Joe] DePlasco said there are about 800 people currently working on the Atlantic Yards project...
Of these workers, 410 are city residents including 174 from Brooklyn, of which 67 are from Central Brooklyn...
DePlasco said of the 36 people that went through the BUILD pre-apprenticeship training program, 19 were working in property management, retail or construction-related positions as of September this year.
All that is irrelevant to the question of whether the 36 people, who began the program in August 2010, were promised jobs and union cards. After all, some of those 19 people have jobs at McDonald's
Posted by steve at November 20, 2011 10:35 PM