« Appeals Court To Hear Atlantic Yards Case | Main | SUNDAY: Walk Don't Destroy 3 »

October 8, 2007

In eminent domain appeal, plaintiffs say illegitimate sequence means case deserves discovery

Atlantic Yards Report

Norman Oder examines the legal briefs and explains what's at stake at tomorrow's oral arguments before the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in the federal eminent domain lawsuit:

U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis already dismissed their case for a failure to state a claim, ruling that presence of some measure of public benefits—mass transit improvements, the removal of blight, subsidized housing, a sports facility, open space—trumped any allegation that the project might primarily confer a private benefit on developer Forest City Ratner.

There’s a difference, the plaintiffs argue in a final reply brief, and it has to do with process. Precedential cases, which drew on more egregious fact patterns—severe blight in Washington, DC (Berman), and a land oligopoly in Hawaii (Midkiff)—lead courts to defer to legislative determinations, as the Supreme Court in 2005 did in its narrow Kelo v. New London decision, upholding the use of eminent domain for economic development.

The brief says the courts must “resolve the obvious tension between and among” the three cases, which call for courts to defer to “a legislative determination that a taking serves a public purpose” but, as reaffirmed in Kelo, must look carefully at “plausible allegations that ostensibly ‘public’ purposes are pretextual and that the real purpose of a taking is to benefit a private developer.”

The plaintiffs--13 homeowners, business owners, residential and commercial tenants--suggest that, in this case, no deference is warranted, because “all of the indicia of legitimate public decisionmaking are absent, and most or all of the indicia of illegitimate private decisionmaking are present.”


NoLandGrab: In other words, the plaintiffs are trying to convince the Appeals Court that the court shouldn't defer to a "legislative determination" that the project serves a "public purpose," because events indicate that Atlantic Yards was a done deal, decided by powerbrokers in backrooms, in order to benefit Bruce Ratner.

Posted by lumi at October 8, 2007 8:22 AM