August 28, 2006
DEIS Bogus Points: Bogus Blight
Atlantic Yards Report uncovered a couple examples of bogus blight after reading the Blight Study, released along with the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and General Project Plan.
First, AYR quoted Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn's attorney Jeff Baker, who made a point about the railyards on WNYC's Brian Lehrer Show (link):
They’re counting as an element of blight, the Vanderbilt Yard railyard. I’m not sure it qualifies as blight; it’s in active use by the MTA and LIRR… There’s been no effort by any state or city authority for at least the last 30 years to develop it. It could also be considered an asset.
If the state-owned railyards have never been developed, can they be considered "blighted?" If not, then the percentage of "blighted" property in the footprint drops dramatically, as seen in the side-by-side comparison.
In another post, AYR explained that much of the non-railyard property in the footprint is deemed "blighted" because it is underdeveloped, meaning either at least 50% of the lot is vacant or the property is developed to less than 60% of the allowable Floor Area Ratio (in other words it isn't big enough). Under the 60% rule, Bruce Ratner's own Atlantic Center Mall is, like, mad blighted.
The Empire State Development Corporation is bending over backwards to make the case that the area is "characterized by blighted conditions that are unlikely to be removed without public action."
It will be up to the courts to decide whether or not these claims are bogus, but we give the "blight" finding THREE out of FIVE BOGUS POINTS. [It would have scored higher except that it's totally unoriginal there has never been a blight study that has concluded that the study area was not "blighted."]
Posted by lumi at August 28, 2006 6:43 AM