« High Court To Test Seizure Of Homes | Main | Kelo coverage across the nation »
February 20, 2005
Ratner Jeers Hudson Yards Link
From The Park Slope Courier, Forest City Ratner spokesperson Barry Baum denys any links between the open bidding process for the Hudson Railyards and Ratner's deal for the Atlantic Railyards. Opponents claim the MTA has the chance to "get it right in Brooklyn."
Ratner Jeers Hudson Yards Link
By Stephan Witt
The open bidding process instituted by the MTA for the Hudson Yards on Manhattan’s west side should not have a bearing on the proposed Atlantic Yards project, Forest City Companies Spokesperson Barry Baum said last week.
“These are two distinct and separate projects,” said Baum, refusing to elaborate further.
But opponents the FCRC proposal continue to argue that the only way to get maximum value for the 11-acre MTA-owned Atlantic Yards site is for the MTA to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP).
Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn (DDDb) spokesman Daniel Goldstein said for the past year and a half his organization has suspected the that the MTA is working on a sweetheart deal with FCRC.
“This is clearly unacceptable for straphangers and taxpayers,” said Goldstein. “To avoid the debacle and brinkmanship at Hudson Yards, the MTA must now produce the independent appraisal of Atlantic Yards that the committed to this past summer and then issue an RFP, working with community organizations and elected officials to configure development guidelines for the MTA railyards in Prospect Heights, Brooklyn.
Goldstein called the recent Hudson Yards development baby steps toward a truly open bidding process, but said it still has a long way to go.
“The MTA can get it right in Brooklyn, from the start, with an RFP,” Goldstein added.
MTA Spokesperson Tom Kelly said the MTA is either currently working on getting the property appraised.
Kelly said some talks have been held with FCRC, but they are still waiting for the company to get back to them.
Baum said that FCRC would not discuss negotiations with the city, state or MTA.
“The MOU (Memorandum of Understanding between FCRC, the city, state, and MTA) is a complicated document that is changing often,” Baum said.
Baum also said it doesn’t matter which comes first between the MOU and a binding Community Benefits Agreement (CBA). Both will happen, he said.
Meanwhile, the Fort Greene Association (FGA), which is hosting a 7:30 p.m. February 28 informational community forum on the project at the Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church (South Oxford and Lafayette Avenue), issued a press release indicating that FCRC has withdrawn from participating in the meeting.
The press released, which was issued in conjunction with DDDb, also said repeated invitations to both BUILD and ACORN, two grassroots groups supporting the project, have both gone unanswered.
Baum said FCRC has been very open with the community throughout this process and the company would be happy to meet with the FCA.
“However, until the MOU is signed we don’t have any new information to discuss,” said Baum. “Once the MOU is signed we will coordinate a mutually acceptable date to meet with the For Greene Association and we look forward to it.”
ACORN Executive Director Bertha Lewis questioned the objectivity of the FGA.
“These folks wrote a letter months ago talking about how they were opposed to the project,” said Lewis. “We have other work to do. There are a lot of forums we don’t attend, so we’re not going.”
BUILD President James Caldwell said the organization will send a representative and he may attend himself.
Paul Palazzo, co-chair of the FGA Atlantic Yards Committee, said while the FGA has a coalition with DDDb, they have gone out of their way to make the forum as objective as possible.
Posted by lumi at February 20, 2005 4:38 PM